I am not a scholar, and this is not a fatwa. This article explains, carefully, a question the first Zakat on Bitcoin article only touched on: when you earn new Bitcoin from staking or mining, does Zakat apply to those rewards, and if so, when? Scholars do not agree on one settled answer, and this article does not pick a fatwa for you. For your own situation, consult a qualified scholar you trust.
Zakat on Bitcoin you already hold is one question. Staking and mining rewards are a second question, because they are new wealth that arrives over time. The Qur'an commands Zakat in general terms — for example, Surah At-Tawbah 9:34 warns against hoarding gold and silver without spending in the way of God, and Surah At-Tawbah 9:60 lists the categories of people entitled to receive Zakat. The classical rules for gold, silver and cash are detailed in hadith literature, for example Sunan Abi Dawud 1563, 1564 and 1565 on Zakat on gold and silver. There is no hadith that mentions Bitcoin, staking or mining, because those did not exist at the time. Scholars therefore reason by analogy (qiyas) from gold, silver, cash and trade goods — and different scholars reason differently.
Mining rewards are also new Bitcoin, but they arrive as payment for work and running equipment, which is why some scholars discuss them alongside income and trade goods rather than only alongside cash. The practical views are similar: value the mined Bitcoin you still hold on your Zakat date, at its market price on that date, and include it in your total if you follow the view that Zakat is due. What scholars differ on is whether mined coins should be valued when they are mined, or only on the Zakat date, and whether mining costs and equipment change the calculation. This article does not settle that difference.
It does not decide whether staking itself is permissible — some scholars raise separate questions about staking contracts, interest-like returns, and uncertainty (gharar). If staking is impermissible in the view you follow, the Zakat question is secondary to that ruling. It also does not give you a personal calculation. Rewards, prices and lock-ups change, and a scholar who knows your contract and your circumstances is the right person to ask.
What are the main views on zakat on staking rewards? Rewards count at your zakat date, on one view commonly cited among scholars who treat Bitcoin like cash: add all Bitcoin you own, including staking rewards you have received and can access, to your other zakatable wealth, and pay 2.5 percent of the full total if it is above nisab and the hawl condition is met, with no separate year needed for the reward. Another view treats each new reward as new wealth, so its own lunar year must pass before zakat is due on that specific reward. A third point is that locked rewards may be deferred, where some scholars compare them to inaccessible wealth, while others say ownership alone is enough.
How are mining rewards treated? Mining rewards are also new Bitcoin, but they arrive as payment for work and running equipment, which is why some scholars discuss them alongside income and trade goods rather than only alongside cash. The practical views are similar: value the mined Bitcoin you still hold on your zakat date, at its market price on that date, and include it in your total if you follow the view that zakat is due. Scholars differ on whether mined coins should be valued when they are mined, or only on the zakat date, and whether mining costs and equipment change the calculation, which the article does not settle.
What does the article not decide about staking and mining rewards? It does not decide whether staking itself is permissible, since some scholars raise separate questions about staking contracts, interest-like returns, and uncertainty, and if staking is impermissible in the view you follow, the zakat question is secondary to that ruling. It also does not give a personal calculation, because rewards, prices and lock-ups change, and a scholar who knows your contract and circumstances is the right person to ask. The article is not a fatwa.
Not religious or financial advice. This article summarises publicly stated scholarly positions for informational purposes and is not a fatwa. The author is not a scholar of Islamic jurisprudence. Consult a qualified scholar for rulings on your own situation. Sulivex provides price comparison only. Not financial advice. Prices are approximate — verify before making decisions.